Wednesday, May 20, 2009

It's Time for Change

The following letter was published in TODAY on 20 May 2009.

WORKER TRANSPORT
It’s time for change

Letter from Isabel Vadivu Govind
I REFER to “Tragedy at Gul Road” (May 19) in which four foreign workers died.

Concerns about transporting workers in the backs of lorries have been raised. I understand that the Land Transport Authorities said in March last year that it was setting up a work group with the Ministry of Manpower to review this.

More than a year and about 200 injuries and six deaths later, things do not seem to have changed.

Cost, I believe, is the reason why we need a “work group” to discuss what is obvious should be done.

Yes, it will be more expensive to humanely transport workers. But this is part of our ethical responsibility as a receiving country of foreign labour.

The present practice of transporting such workers is unsafe, inhumane and does not treat people with respect or dignity.

It is disturbing that as a developed nation we allow this. Furthermore, doing so is a safety hazard for other road users.

I would like to urge a ban on the transporting of people in the backs of lorries.

All workers should be seated in buses when being transported.

And I urge the swift implementation of such a ban without the excuse that it would take a long time to make the change at a practical level.

We are efficient in many ways. I am certain we can be efficient in this matter if we recognise how important it is.

We do not need a work group.

We need action and we need it now, before more lives are lost.

Let the deaths of the four workers not be in vain.


The Unacceptable Cost of Cheap Labour

The following blog post was published by UK Telegraph reporter, Ben Bland, as part his Asia File series, on 20 May 2009. To access it, click here.

The Unacceptable Cost of Cheap Labour
By Ben Bland, The Asia File

First thing in the morning and late at night, Singapore's tree-lined highways are full of lorries and trucks carrying a vital cargo: the migrant workers from Bangladesh and India who are the backbone of the Lion City's economic miracle.

Crammed into the rear deck, the only protection they have from the scorching sun and the perpetual downpours is a bit of plastic sheeting. But the weather is the least of their worries.

Before sunrise on Monday morning, four workers from India and Bangladesh set off from their humble quarters for the shipyard where they were employed. But none of them arrived at work after the lorry they were travelling in hit the back of a larger truck parked by the roadside and they were killed in the collision.

One of the victims had been travelling in the front passenger seat but the other three had been sitting in the back of their vehicle. Six others were injured but survived.

The fatal accident has once more brought the shoddy treatment of migrant workers in Singapore to public attention.

While cattle are transported in comfortable air-conditioned surroundings, Singapore's construction and shipping workers are afforded no such luxury.

The authorities only stipulate that each worker has at least 0.372 square metres of floor space and that lorries do not carry more people than they are licensed to.

210 people were injured while traveling in the back of lorries in Singapore last year and two killed. 186 were hurt in 2007 and two killed.

So long as unscrupulous companies are allowed to carry people in worse conditions than animals, the deaths and injuries will continue.

The Gulf state of Bahrain, which does not exactly have a reputation as a haven of workers' rights, has introduced a ban on using trucks to transport labourers.

But Singapore seems to have no intention of altering the status quo, largely because of the purported costs to business in a state that is dependent on external trade and investment. (It's obviously cheaper to pay the odd hospital bill and coffin shipping costs than it is to hire a mini-bus.)

It's a pretty despicable situation that reflects a xenophobic attitude to foreign labour. People are happy to milk the economic benefits of cheaply imported workers but are not so willing to accord them rights and respect.

Nimby-ist Singaporeans complain whenever a foreign workers' hostel is built in their vicinity and, according to one earnest writer in the Straits Times today, if migrant labourers were to be given public transport passes instead of being thrown onto the back of trucks, "some segments of the local population may complain about having to share standing space in trains and buses with foreign workers".

In Favour of Humane Treatment for All Workers

"We have rules for safety belts to be fitted inside cars and worn by passengers but no protective measures like this exist for those who are forced to travel externally on a vehicle. It does not make sense at all in a civilised and developed society that this way of transporting workers is accepted. It is hazardous, and an accident waiting to happen as has been evidenced on many occasions.

These conditions are inhumane. I am in favour of humane treatment and consistent standards for all workers regardless of their class.

I support a ban on such methods of transport which are a common sight on Singapore roads. The sooner the ban can be introduced, the sooner more lives will be saved."

Welfare Officer, 35, Singaporean

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

4 die after lorry hits trailer

The following article was published in the Straits Times on 19 May 2009.

ACCIDENT IN TUAS
4 die after lorry hits trailer
Six others hurt; trailer driver was asleep in parked vehicle at the time
By Teh Joo Lin & Jalelah Abu Baker
May 19, 2009

Reproduced photo caption:The brother-in law (right) of one of the deceased, Pitchaiah Govindaraj, 31, grieving outside the Emergency Department at NUH. -- ST PHOTO: STEPHANIE YEOW

Reproduced photo caption:Rescuers had to use a hydraulic cutter and two winches to free the body of the front-seat passenger. The lorry was ferrying a group of workers to their workplace at a shipyard at the end of Gul Road at the time.-- ST PHOTO: JOYCE FANG


HE HAD stopped his trailer at the side of the road for forty winks, and was just drifting off when the 12m-long vehicle wobbled.

Mr Shukor Ayub thought nothing of it, but seconds later, a man appeared at his window, rapping furiously.

Startled awake, he climbed out, and saw carnage.

A lorry ferrying 10 foreign workers had smashed into the back of his massive 22-wheeler. Four men were killed, six others injured.

'I didn't even realise it until someone came and told me,' said the stunned 30-year-old Malaysian.

The only damage to the trailer was a loose wheel.

Monday, February 25, 2008

Overturned vehicles involve mostly trucks with heavy loads

The following article was published by Channel NewsAsia on 25 Feb 2008.

Overturned vehicles involve mostly trucks with heavy loads

25 February 2008
Channel NewsAsia

SINGAPORE : The MediaCorp News hotline received eight calls about accidents involving overturned vehicles, between December last year and the first week of February this year.

This compares to just two cases between October and November last year.

And these are just the numbers in our records.

Traffic Police say there are no exact figures of overturned vehicles in the past few months.

This is because only accidents with injuries or fatalities are recorded.

From the reports we received, most involved trucks carrying heavy loads.

Experts say longer vehicles like trailers and lorries carrying such loads are most at risk of overturning.

The reason is these vehicles have a higher centre of gravity.

So a normal car with just front or back two-wheel drive has a lower risk due to its lower centre of gravity. On August 23 last year, a tragic accident happened.

A foreign worker was killed when he and 13 others were flung out of a lorry, along the Pan Island Expressway after their vehicle overturned.

And when vehicles topple, it usually involves trucks and lorries carrying heavy loads.

Associate Professor Seah Kah Heng, Department of Mechanical Engineering at the National University of Singapore, said: "The centre of gravity might be quite high because they pack the cargo, and they try to pack as much as possible. Sometimes you pack the cargo to such an extent that you are not aware that the centre of gravity has gone up so much. And it is extremely dangerous to go around the corner fast."

"When you go round a sharp corner, there's such a thing called the centrifugal force. It is a force that tends to overturn the car out of the corner.

"If you are talking about trailers, some trailers have got this hinge between the prime mover and whatever cargo you're pulling. When it turns a corner, there will be some lateral or side force pulling it sideways. So that force can also cause a vehicle to overturn."

The centrifugal force is calculated based on the mass, the velocity of the vehicle and the radius of the curve.

The sharper the turn, the greater the force will act on a vehicle if a motorist is coming down at high speed.

Based on the formula, if a motorist is driving twice as fast, he will create four times a greater centrifugal force which means he is four times more likely to have his vehicle overturn.

And braking hard while driving straight can also tip a car over.

Professor Seah said: "Sometimes the brakes right and left, front and back are not balanced, and that gives the car a certain fall sideways as well. When you brake the tyre, if the tyres are not worn out evenly, it can pull the car to one side. And that can cause overturning. If something is on the road, like causing a bump, or the road is not even. That's another possibility causing the car to overturn."

The Automobile Association of Singapore says it is crucial for motorists to check their tyres regularly.

If they are not inflated properly or they are already worn out, a motorist may lose control of your vehicle. - CNA/de

(c) 2008 MediaCorp News Pte Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Monday, September 10, 2007

More trucks caught with too many workers aboard

The following article was published in the Straits Times on 10 Sep 2007.

More trucks caught with too many workers aboard
Carolyn Quek
10 September 2007
Straits Times

With a construction boom on, contractors are rushing workers from site to site

FOUR years since the tightening of the rules to enhance the safety of workers being ferried in pickup trucks, the situation seems little better.

Last year, almost 300 trucks were caught with too many workers on board, up from 262 in 2005.

And with already 182 caught at the end of July, the numbers look set to hit a fresh high at year's end.

Between 2005 and this year thus far, eight workers have died in accidents while being ferried.

A Land Transport Authority (LTA) spokesman said: 'While the LTA and the Traffic Police will conduct strict enforcement against goods vehicle owners who violate safety rules, these owners also have a big role to play in proactively taking measures to enhance the safety of their workers carried at the back of vehicles.'

Industry players said that with the current construction boom, companies were taking on more projects than they had resources for - which has put more workers on the roads as contractors rush them from site to site to complete jobs on schedule.

The 145,000 foreign construction workers here are set to be joined by up to 50,000 more, who will stream in over the next few years for the building of mega projects like the integrated resorts.

Mr Raymond Lim, 50, director of Jackly Engineering, said that to be cost-effective, his lorries had to do double duty - transport both materials and workers.

Putting workers on buses made it safer and more comfortable for them, but buses cannot carry materials, said Mr Lim, who has 70 to 80 foreign workers on his payroll.

Another obstacle to using buses for workers: red tape.

Boon Yang Electrical's general manager, Mr Alex Sim, 35, said sensitive worksites required official clearance for vehicles, so hiring buses to transport workers added to the paperwork.

The issue has come under scrutiny since an accident last month in which a foreign worker was killed and his fellow passengers injured when their pickup truck was hit by a car. The truck spun around, flinging out the men who were on the cargo deck, and then turned turtle.

Tragically for the workers, the truck was not even their usual mode of transport, the vehicle's driver, Mr Chan Guang Quan, told The Straits Times yesterday.

They were usually ferried to their worksite in Bishan in buses, but had been deployed to another building project in Changi that day to lend help there.

Mr Chan, 42, said that while some workers were still on medical leave, most were already back at work.

He added: 'We are trying not to think about the accident so that we can move on with life.'

The accident triggered a debate online and letters to the media, decrying the practice of using pickup trucks to ferry workers around. It was tantamount to treating them no better than animals, these people said.

Back in 2002, following similar accidents, this was exactly the sentiment expressed in letters to The Straits Times Forum pages.

One recent letter writer, Mr Paul Staes, likened the ferrying of workers on cargo decks to transporting cattle.

The LTA put in place regulations in 2003 to set up minimum standards of safety and comfort for workers being transported, but there were still five deaths last year.

Four years on, the suggestions from safety experts, volunteer groups and others on improving safety remain similar. They have called for:

Seats along the sides of the vehicle, just like those in army trucks, which can be folded down when not in use;

Side railings that rise higher than the heads of seated passengers; and

Canopies for all lorries and pickups to shield workers from the elements.

All these features can be dismantled and companies have to pay only once to have them fitted.

Transport analyst K. Raguraman of the National University of Singapore said the system - maintenance of the trucks, alternatives and cost - cried out for a 'proper study'.

To be fair, said construction company bosses, some companies do provide good, safe transport.

United Engineering (UE), Lee Metal Group and Straits Construction, for instance, ferry their workers to and from worksites in buses.

But these companies' spokesmen said they could do this because they were relatively large, had big projects and enjoyed economies of scale, unlike smaller contractors.

For now, if making workers' transport safer remains intractable, calls have gone out to at least make it more comfortable.

Ms Braema Mathi, who chairs research and policy of migrant workers' rights group Transient Workers Count Too, has urged companies to build canopies on their pickups and lorries.

She said: 'I do not know how effective the workers can be if they are wet and ill.'

At least one company is going some way towards keeping its vehicles in good shape so they can run safely.

Stacon, which hires a dozen workers, puts $600 a month into maintaining its four lorries.

Its general manager, Mr Eddie Lim, 44, said: 'This money cannot be saved. If we do, there will be more problems in the future.'

Guidelines to ensure safety THE Road Traffic Act bars goods vehicles from being used as a means of private passenger transport, but it allows the owners of such vehicles to transport their workers to and from their place of work.

The Land Transport Authority laid down the following rules in April 2003 to ensure the safety of these workers:

They must be seated no more than 3.2m off the ground and in such a way that they will not fall off.

Each worker must have at least 0.372sqm of floor space, slightly bigger than a full page of this newspaper.

The goods vehicle must stay within a 60kmh speed limit when carrying workers.

It must not carry more workers than it is licensed to.

If goods are also being transported, they must be secured.

Open lorries with a maximum laden weight of 3,500kg or under must have side railings along the sideboards on the cargo deck.

When these rules came into force, the number of cases of overloading fell by almost half - from 508 in 2003 to 262 in 2005. But the number inched up to 293 last year; in the first seven months of this year alone, the figure has already hit 182.

In 2004, the year after the rules took effect, no deaths were reported in accidents involving workers being transported, although 87 of them were hurt. In 2005, two died and 67 were injured, while last year, five died and 76 were injured.

Friday, September 6, 2002

Foreign worker dies after fall from lorry

The following article was published in the Straits Times on 9 June 2002.

Foreign worker dies after fall from lorry.
By Chong Chee Kin.
9 June 2002

Indian national was on his way back to living quarters with seven others when he fell; he died later from head injuries

A CONSTRUCTION worker died after falling from the back of a lorry on Friday night.

The 26-year-old Indian national was with seven of his countrymen, who were being transported back to their living quarters, when the accident happened at the T-junction between Boon Lay Drive and Boon Lay Road at about 8.30 pm.

A police spokesman said the worker is believed to have fallen from the back of the lorry as it was travelling along Boon Lay Drive.

The man suffered serious head injuries and was taken to the National University Hospital, where he died about an hour later.

A check by The Sunday Times showed that at least 20 foreign workers have been either killed or injured in similar accidents over the past two years.

In November last year, seven workers were injured after they were flung out of a lorry which hit two buses.

Three months earlier, another seven constructionworkers were flung out of the back of a lorry in a similar accident at the junction between Serangoon Road and Desker Road.

One of them, Mr Palaniyandi Servai Chinnallannu, 35, died two hours after the accident. The others suffered injuries but survived.

The rash of accidents sparked a debate in The Straits Times' Forum pages last month.

Letter writers hit out at the way foreign workers were 'transported like animals' in the lorries.

Mr John Barker wrote that he was amazed that the law allowed workers to travel in the back of trucks without either seats or seat belts.

'This makes a mockery of the law which requires seat belts to be worn when in the rear seats of cars,' he wrote.

Mr Mohamed Yazid Sallim also wrote to say that the practice was a serious and dangerous traffic violation.

Often, he noted, the workers were not only crammed in the back of an open vehicle but were also seated next to heavy machinery and sharp tools.

'It is an accident waiting to happen,' he wrote.

However, the Singapore Contractors Association said that the lorry was the most efficient means of ferryingworkers to and from their workplaces.

Citing statistics from the Land Transport Authority, it said the fatality rate involving the transportation of workersin open lorries was significantly lower than the overall fatality rate for all vehicles.

Meanwhile, the police are appealing for eyewitnesses to the latest accident.

Those with information should call 1800-547-1818.

DANGERS IN THE REAR

August 2001: Seven construction workers in the back of a lorry are flung out after the lorry hits another vehicle. One of them dies two hours later, while the rest are injured.

November 2001: Another seven workers are injured, also after being flung out of the lorry they were in when the vehicle hits two buses. June 2002: Another construction worker dies after falling from the back of a lorry.

(c) 2002 Singapore Press Holdings Limited